TED Talk Inspires Young Inventor to Bypass College; Win Thiel Fellowship

Open Source Ecology's Marcin Jakubowski

Yoonseo Kang was a member of his high school Robotics team. He thought he might like to study engineering and economics in college and his family was looking forward to his successful college career. However, according to an interview by MAKE, Yoonseo watched the Open Source Ecology’s (OSE) founder Marcin Jakubowski’s TEDTalk and decided to take a different path for his future. Yoonseo decided to move to Macrin Jakubowski’s Factor E Farm in Missouri where he’s helping build the open source economy.

As a result of some of the work Yoonseo has done at OSE, he’s been awarded a 100,000 Thiel Fellowship. The Thiel Fellowship helps young entrepreneurs under 20 who decide not to attend college fund their dreams for changing the world. Peter Thiel takes the view that a college degree harms innovators because of the conservative, career-driven mindset it imparts.

Yoonseo is one of many brilliant young people choosing alternatives to college. MIT’s Technology Review highlights another Thiel Fellow, a gifted homeschooler, Laura Deming, who attended MIT at 14 and left at 17 to accept the Thiel Fellowship. So what do TED and Thiel have in common that inspires and lures young people toward college alternatives? Perhaps it’s the excitement around big, crazy ideas and the audacity to make them a reality that a college education doesn’t just support.

by Gina Clifford

Learning Calculus and Quantum Physics Through Comics

Calculus and Quantum Physics through Comics

Many people find calculus and quantum physics intimidating. These subjects are for geeky, smart kids with no social life, right? Well, geeky kids might find calculus fun and interesting in ways most others may not, but thanks to comic-style books on these subjects, calculus and physics feel more like reading the Sunday comics in the newspaper than memorizing mind-bending formulas and esoteric theorems. Even better, comics appeal to younger kids, making calculus and physics more accessible to everyone.

The Cartoon Guide to Calculus

Larry Gornick

The writing is irreverent and witty, with likable cartoon characters delivering tidbits of important information. We love Gornick’s personification of functions as bodily functions and his lovable professor and hip female sidekick characters. They make learning about limits, functions, and derivatives fun!

Quantum Thoery A Graphic Guide

J. P. McEvoy and Oscar Zarate

The Quantum Theory Graphic Guide isn’t a humorous book like The Cartoon Guide to Calculus, but it does have comic appeal with its off-the-wall illustrations. This book breaks concepts into small, manageable chunks of text but delivers its impact through its illustrations. Characters are mostly famous quantum physicists from history and they’re drawn to look rather odd. In fact, they’d fit into the Addams Family pretty well. By the end of this book, readers will feel like they know Niels Bohr, Max Planck, Wolfgang Pauli, and other famous quantum physicists.

These books engage learners through quirky, witty humor and are a great way to erase the intimidation factor that looms over physics and calculus. Wouldn’t it be great if kids think about Calculus the same way they think about learning to ride a bike or to sing a song? The key is to keep it fun. Don’t establish rules for reading these books. After all, following rules sucks all the fun out of learning. So, keep an open mind and laugh at the funny illustrations and geeky humor. Understand that the most important part of any learning process is the joy of it. If something doesn’t make sense or appeal to a learner, skip to the next section or take a break. Use these materials to supplement traditional materials or as an introduction. Either way, focus on the joy of learning.

It’s refreshing to see authors embracing this format because  kids find comic books fascinating and will read anything more readily in this format. Add a bit of humor and you’ve got an irresistible hook for sharing just about anything.

Related articles

By Gina Clifford

Gina Clifford is the founder and publisher for SpottyBanana. She is a child-led, project-based learning advocate, an online communications manager for a Fortune 500 company, and a TEDx Organizer. Gina enjoys sharing resources, ideas, news, and voices that prompt readers to ‘think differently’ about education and learning.

Ivan Illich – Seeing the Future of Education?

Homeschool Learning

According to Ivan Illich in 1972, “Universal education through schooling is not feasible”.  His radical ideas regarding schooling provoked much debate back in the 1970s, with most dismissing him as an over-zealous new-age hippy.  Could it be, however, that he was rather a forward-thinking would-be educational revolutionary?  Are his ideas still valid today, and have any of his suggestions actually come into being?  Some would argue that Illich had a vision of a home-schooling future which could be highly effective, and overshadow the formal education system altogether.

Believing schools to be guilty of corrupting society, Illich preached that our entire culture was institutionalised and in order to de-institutionalise ourselves, we needed to ‘deschool’ society.  Quite apart from this philosophy, he felt that our schooling methods were altogether counterproductive.  Teaching a child, through the formal system, he argued, may lead to high grades and the ability to regurgitate lessons and information, but it did not lead to the child thinking for himself and learning to come up with ‘something new’.  In short, children are being told what they should know, instead of finding things out for themselves.  This is, according to Illich, confusing ‘teaching’ with ‘learning’ or ‘grade advancement’ with ‘education’.

Illich believed that we should focus on ‘action’ rather than ‘consumption’ – rather than being spoon-fed information, we should be getting up and discovering it for ourselves.  This concept could be applied to the learning environment by way of bringing ideas and possibilities to the table and encouraging the child to make use of them, rather than simply teaching the child the ‘correct’ answer.  Furthermore, learning should be fun and interesting, incorporating every aspect of our daily lives and looking for learning opportunities in even the smallest action.  Stimulating the child’s thoughts so that they can self-learn is known to be beneficial, and it does seem that across the world, some formal education systems are trying to implement this.  Undoubtedly, however, this type of free-range education is far more achievable in a home-schooling environment.  It is the home-schooled child who has their parent’s attention for most of the day, and it is the parent of the home-schooled child who has the freedom to create the day’s learning around one particular concept.  There are no formal tests –  those which measure some aspects of the child’s knowledge, but cannot possibly indicate the overall spectrum of the child’s learning.

Illich spoke at length of his vision of ‘learning webs’ – educational networks which offered peers with whom the student could work with.  He particularly specified the use of computers for this purpose, voicing his surprise that this had not yet been done.  Indeed, now in 2012, Illich’s idea has come to fruition and not only are we using the internet to find study partners and groups, we are using it to find support and advice, learning materials and information.  We are even using the internet to arrange real life meetings with other home-study groups.

Perhaps Illich is still viewed as a radical thinker, but it can’t be denied that we can all learn something from some of his ideas, and although he died in 2002, it can be assumed that he would have fully approved of the use of the internet for such educational networking.

This article has been written by Sarah O’Reilly on behalf of Sopris Learning who develop learning resources for children & schools. They offer many tools & resources including a reading curriculum.

Summer Fun: Easy Origami Projects

Origami Boxes

Regardless of your plans this summer, its always fun to make stuff. We’ve found several really easy Origami projects that even younger children will enjoy. Best of all, the resulting art is functional and beautiful.

Our favorite project is the box with lid.  Not only are these little boxes attractive, they are great for gift-giving, storing small trinkets like coins, shells, earrings, or any other small treasures.

We used Origami paper, available in arts and crafts stores, to make most of our Origami projects. However, these easy projects work well using wrapping paper, magazine pages, or even news print. The only extra step is to cut your paper into squares of the desired size.

Crafty Journal’s Origami Box How-to

Another really easy and attractive Origami project is the Origami butterfly. With just ten steps, eager hands can make a whole bunch of these in a short period. Why not design a mobile to display these beauties?

Go Origami Butterflies How-to

Origami Butterflies

Origami Butterflies

Origami Cranes/mobiles are possibly the most recognizable Origami crafts. Although a bit more challenging to fold than boxes or butterflies, these classic Origami figures make great mobiles, gifts, and decorations for a child’s bedroom or even an office.

Origami Crane Mobile

Check out our Pinterest Make Things Pinboard for even more Origami projects

By Gina Clifford

Gina Clifford is the founder and publisher for SpottyBanana. She is a child-led, project-based learning advocate, an online communications manager for a Fortune 500 company, and a TEDx Organizer. Gina enjoys sharing resources, ideas, news, and voices that prompt readers to ‘think differently’ about education and learning.

TED-Ed: Lessons Worth Sharing for Homeschoolers and Unschoolers

TED-Ed

TED videos have always been great for kids. We’ve been viewing talks as a family for years, enjoying insights into different ways of thinking. With TED-Ed videos, you can use, tweak, or completely redo any lesson featured on TED-Ed, or create lessons from scratch based on any video from YouTube. The featured lessons are mostly from professional educators and professional animators. While not every professional educator is likely to create content of interest to project-based, child-led learning, the TED-Ed videos are different. They’re thoughtfully presented and beautifully animated. The short videos are less than ten minutes long and share specific knowledge followed by a short quiz.

So, will homeschoolers, unschoolers, and other out-of-the box learners find value with TED-Ed? We plan to find out. Although the TED-Ed website is now educator-focused, we’re betting self-motivated learners will dig into the content and explore deeply and enjoyably. Hopefully, TED will invite subject matter experts to share lessons, too. Wouldn’t it be awesome if Google’s Sergey Brin created a lesson on how a search engine works?

We’d like to see the TED-Ed portal ‘flipped’ a bit to be more learner-welcoming. Actually, as homeschoolers or unschoolers who are self-motivated learners, why not submit your own lessons? Why not grab a few of your favorite YouTube videos and, with the help of your children, create lessons around the videos to share with the world? The new TED-Ed platform makes it easy.

By Gina Clifford

Gina Clifford is the founder and publisher for SpottyBanana. She is a child-led, project-based learning advocate, an online communications manager for a Fortune 500 company, and a TEDx Organizer. Gina enjoys sharing resources, ideas, news, and voices that prompt readers to ‘think differently’ about education and learning.

Google’s Erez Lieberman Aiden Makes Mathematics Fun

Erez Lieberman Aiden's Genome Globule Research

Erez Lieberman Aiden's Genome Globule Research

Erez Lieberman Aiden is an accomplished mathematician and physicist, winning many of the top prizes in math and science and all before the age of 35. If you are familiar with Google’s Ngram website, you’ve already had a peek into Erez Lieberman’s research. Lately, though, he’s been delving into the human genome and I was lucky enough to catch his talk and get his advice for budding scientists and mathematicians.

Read more on GeekMom

By Gina Clifford

Gina Clifford is the founder and publisher for SpottyBanana. She is a child-led, project-based learning advocate, an online communications manager for a Fortune 500 company, and a TEDx Organizer. Gina enjoys sharing resources, ideas, news, and voices that prompt readers to ‘think differently’ about education and learning.

Why it’s Important that Tor/Forge Books are Going DRM-Free

Old Tampa Book Company

Digital Rights Management (DRM) is a security measure placed on digital material to prevent people from making unauthorized copies of copyrighted material. The problem that occurs, though, is that people comfortable with printed books that have made the shift to ebooks find that DRM protections prevent them from using ebooks the way they currently use printed books.

Read Julia Sherred’s GeekMom post about why Tor/Forge Books are going DRM-free.

By Gina Clifford

Gina Clifford is the founder and publisher for SpottyBanana. She is a child-led, project-based learning advocate, an online communications manager for a Fortune 500 company, and a TEDx Organizer. Gina enjoys sharing resources, ideas, news, and voices that prompt readers to ‘think differently’ about education and learning.

Weird and Annoying? Only to Those Who Can’t Think Outside the Box

Box Boy.JPG

You know that child, the precocious know-it-all that talks enthusiastically and incessantly about arcane topics like 19th century rifling patterns. This child is so ‘odd’. Normal children do not talk like ‘little professors’. Normal children talk about age-appropriate material, like their favorite star on American Idol or the latest episode of Sponge Bob. So, what would our ‘normal’ children talk about if schools didn’t exist or were structured around children’s interests, didn’t use testing to measure success, and encouraged learning as much or more than teaching? They’d be more interesting. They’d be more like many homeschoolers. The weird ones would be the ones who weren’t engaged with the world, their passions, and their destinies. Read what one Mom has to say about the ‘Weirdo’ homeschoolers and let us know what you think.

Why are Homeschooled Kids so Annoying

By Gina Clifford

Gina Clifford is the founder and publisher for SpottyBanana. She is a child-led, project-based learning advocate, an online communications manager for a Fortune 500 company, and a TEDx Organizer. Gina enjoys sharing resources, ideas, news, and voices that prompt readers to ‘think differently’ about education and learning.

It’s Time to Reevaluate How We Evaluate Our Kids

The scandal began a few years ago when The Atlanta Constitution Journal decided to analyze multiple years worth of standardized test scores from schools in the Atlanta area, in an attempt to clarify just how effective these tests were in evaluating student academic progress.   With the millions of dollars and countless hours and other resources our school districts spend on standardized testing, it’s amazing no one thought to do this sooner.  But my, oh my, how eye opening the results have been.

The study uncovered countless statistical anomalies and struggled to explain them without using the word “cheating”.  An investigation ensued, and cheating was indeed proven in roughly half of the Atlanta-area elementary and middle schools.   Teachers admitted not following test protocols, by allowing students extra time to finish or erase answers and rework incorrect problems, obtaining advance copies of the test to “preview” with their students before test day, and even outright falsifying test results.   The degree of moral corruption and flagrant violation of policy was astounding, but this is a prime example of what educators are driven to do when their funding, and sometimes their very jobs, depend on meeting goals set by education bureaucrats.

On March 25, 2012, the Dayton Daily News announced they had partnered with their peers at the Atlanta Constitution Journal to conduct a similar examination of standardized test scores in Ohio.  (Read the full Dayton Daily News article here, and the companion article from the Atlanta Constitution Journal here.)  They used advanced statistical analysis to uncover the same sorts of patterns and anomalies in test results over a seven year period.  But the problem isn’t limited to just Atlanta or Ohio.  Coast to coast, schools across the nation are failing critical reviews of their test results.  As the Dayton Daily News article states:

The analysis flagged as suspicious any score change that had less than a 5 percent probability of occurring by chance based on all the other scores on that test in the state.  The study then calculated the probability that any district would have the number of flagged improbable scores it had in any one year.  In some cases, those probabilities were approaching zero.

As many in the homeschooling community have known for years, it’s time to change how we evaluate student progress, because standardized testing is not the panacea it was once thought to be.  The homeschool laws in some states allow for parents to either submit annual standardized test scores or have a portfolio of the child’s work evaluated by a licensed teacher each year.    The option for homeschool portfolios has the advantage of only comparing the student’s work to their own work from the previous year, so the assessment of their progress is individual, unlike standardized test results that compare homeschoolers to students in the same grade nationwide.

There are countless other ways to evaluate how much a student has learned, as in the portfolio process where samples of their work are displayed.  It’s often been said the best way to prove you know something is to teach it to someone else, not to take a test on it yourself.  Project-based learning also provides tangible proof of the learning experience, as does critical thinking and applying learned knowledge to problem-solving situations and the creative process.  But these don’t mesh with the one-size-fits-all approach of public schools and their reliance on standardized testing, and unfortunately are unlikely to be implemented on anything but the most local of levels.

It’s high time schools stopped cheating their students out of an education by limiting them within the narrow parameters of an evaluation system created by bureaucrats, especially now that the system has been proven to be riddled with dishonesty and cheating.  Is that really what parents send their kids to school to learn?

About the Author:  Jennifer Needham is an “accidental homeschooler” who was disillusioned enough with the public school system to pull her kids out after only one year.  As a nutrition educator, she also writes a free homeschool nutrition curriculum at her website, Nutrition for Healthy Kids.

New Intel Education Tablet Device Designed for Classroom Management not Learning

According to the Wall Street Journal, Intel is developing a small, ruggedized tablet device called the studybook aimed squarely at school students. Smaller and less expensive than an iPad, the device will feature cameras with applications for performing time-lapse photography and add-on lenses that turn the device into a microscope (although you can do this just as easily with an iPod touch).  Apparently, the tablet device appeals to children around the globe, especially in developing nations. In fact, the devices will feature native language applications and content.The water, dirt, and drop-resistant device also features an e-book reader app. At first blush, this device sounds like the perfect solution for an increasingly mobile global population. However, IT management features and Intel’s software bundle hints at command and control tactics used by schools to ‘control’ the user experience.  Will students even be allowed to take the devices home? These management tools will make it even easier for schools to block  blogs, YouTube, and other rich online content. Even the name, Studybook, makes non-traditional learners shudder. It has an authoritative, old-school, all-work-no-play ring to it.

According to Intel’s press release, “Teachers are an integral part of the classroom and the new Intel Learning Series Teacher PC criteria will enable solutions that are developed specifically to meet the needs of teachers.” What about the learners? Is Intel suggesting that children aren’t able to learn without the expert help of a teacher? Has Intel spent any time with young children who know more about their parent’s iPhones than the parents themselves know? Has Intel looked at children outside the classroom to understand how these types of devices, open-ended and not purpose-driven, can be used in ways not intended or imagined by the inventor? By tethering these cool new devices to a classroom management system with teacher controls, Intel is squeezing the life (and fun) out of innovation, creativity and imagination. In other words, the Studybook might as well be a printed paper book (or a paper weight) after implementing all the ”classroom management” measures.

Schools aren’t exactly setting the world on fire in learning innovation. Most school systems are still modeled for the Industrial Revolution. Many teachers are technology-phobic and ban mobile devices from the classroom. Schools still segregate technology into ‘labs’ instead of integrating it into every aspect of the learning experience. Is this really the model around which to build and launch a new mobile device? A recent Chronicle of Higher Education article points to the future of learning and it isn’t the traditional classroom model.

Learning isn’t something we’re taught. Technology that takes advantage of natural human curiosity, ingenuity, and imagination moves humanity forward by providing an open-ended experience through which we express ideas. However, when technology seeks to manage and control our experience, it hinders or retards the natural learning process, becomes less interesting to us, and makes the case (for frustrated users) for jettisoning technology altogether.

Hopefully, Intel’s OEMs will create models without the software controls for an increasing global population of non-traditional learners who learn outside of a teacher-centric environment. The device itself sounds really great for youngsters. Left to an 8 year-old, the Studybook might become a musical instrument, a doll, or a secret agent tool. Let’s embrace the emerging DIY, Maker culture by not artificially controlling the learning experience. Instead, let’s find ways to unleash it!